They also allege the district did not adequately supervise or secure the school campus.

It was she who first alerted the neighbors that a new cell tower was coming to the neighborhood.said of the 2021 court decision.

000 pages of evidence — 447 exhibits in 27 volumes — was submitted to the court documenting biological effects and illness from wireless radiation exposure below heating levels.FCC limits are based on the outdated belief that heating is the only proven harm from RF.So we feel our best argument is just power of the people.

The legal case challenged the FCCs 2019 decision not to update its 1996 regulations regarding allowable radio frequency radiation exposures from wireless technologies — including 5G.Circuit ruled the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ignored scientific evidence and failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its 1996 regulations adequately protect the public against all the harmful effects of wireless radiation.

If you know people in the Torrance area.

com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cadc/20-1025/20-1025-2021-08-13.Warren Furutani speaks at VJAMM dedication in April 2017.

for recruiting volunteers to help maintain the monument on a monthly basis.usually the third Friday of each month from 12 noon.

For more information about the monument or the Arnold Maeda Manzanar Pilgrimage Grant.the VJAMM has weathered for the past six years rain.