ch?
KAS price slumps 4%: can it bounce back?
What we know for sure is that Crown Castle has no issue breaking our telecom wireless ordinances by not complying with the general provisions and sneaking in cell towers without obtaining permits.
decided to appeal the decision and take it up with the Torrance Planning Commission.There is much more to this picture than many of us understand.

It was she who first alerted the neighbors that a new cell tower was coming to the neighborhood.said of the 2021 court decision.000 pages of evidence — 447 exhibits in 27 volumes — was submitted to the court documenting biological effects and illness from wireless radiation exposure below heating levels.

FCC limits are based on the outdated belief that heating is the only proven harm from RF.So we feel our best argument is just power of the people.

The legal case challenged the FCCs 2019 decision not to update its 1996 regulations regarding allowable radio frequency radiation exposures from wireless technologies — including 5G.
Circuit ruled the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ignored scientific evidence and failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its 1996 regulations adequately protect the public against all the harmful effects of wireless radiation.In appreciation for Thomas and Catherine Yoshikawas major donations.
The VJAMM Committee thanks Marisol Perez of Venice Community Housing.The VJAMM reminds everybody of the 1.
and who lined up with only what they could carry on the northwest corner of Venice and Lincoln.Photos courtesy Phyllis Hayashibara Articles for you@media ( min-width: 300px ){.